Another weird thing
Why is it that some sections of society believe it is ok for a woman to “choose” whether or not to end a pregnancy (thus ending the life of an innocent) but at the same time that same sector revolts against the death penalty, (which ends the life of a criminal)?
I can’t even fathom the logic there, how do you even make those arguments without trying to define ending a life differently?
Just so you know, I am out for killing them all. Dont want the baby? Nuke it. You cant be trusted by society? Hang ‘em high. You were innocent? My bad. Next.
Advertisement
Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized
April 13, 2011 at 6:13 pm
Sanctity of life is a red herring. The sections of society who reject abortion and accept the death penalty demonstrate their inherent belief that all [men|women] are *NOT* created equal. That is to say, there is no equivalence between the value of life and the value of a living person when a baby saved is worth more than a murderer killed.
April 15, 2011 at 11:29 am
I disagree whole heartedly. People should be (but arent, hence tards)CREATED equal, but ALL PEOPLE should be RESPONSIBLE for their actions. If your actions make me need to kill you, so be it.
Life is sacred, but so are cows in India, and we EAT them!
Perspective.
April 15, 2011 at 11:57 am
If you ask a pro-life advocate if they would kill a newborn the answer, unless the person is really wacked out, would be no. If you back up the clock and say okay, what about at 38 weeks? Well, no. Why? Because it’s a baby. Okay, what about 30 weeks? Or 25 weeks? 20? What’s the cutoff, and why? Medical science can incubate a baby from a very very early age. Ultrasounds can detect more now than ever before, thus showing life earlier than ever before. The decision of when is a baby a baby has to be answered. We as a society put laws in place to protect the innocent and we live by them. Why don’t these same laws apply to unborn children? Arguably the difference between a cows life being sacred and a human life being sacred is human life is universally accepted as sacred while cows aren’t.
April 15, 2011 at 4:50 pm
“Arguably the difference between a cows life being sacred and a human life being sacred is human life is universally accepted as sacred while cows aren’t.”
Ah, but thats an assumption based on YOUR perspective. To you, ALL people accept that human life is sacred. I would say that the fact that we have murderers and rapists in our society deflates that argument considerably. Not to mention the craziness in Africa, where any tribe can wipe out another for what we would consider to be little reason.
And a baby is a baby upon conception. End case.
April 15, 2011 at 12:17 pm
One other afterthought, I don’t agree that capital punishment is akin to abortion. Capital punishment is a punishment for a crime committed. The guilty are killed because of what they have done, not who they are. That’s the biggest difference between the two. Abortion is taking of a baby’s life because of who they are.
April 15, 2011 at 4:52 pm
My point exactly, but the innocents death is acceptable to the liberal wackos and ending the existence of a criminal is fought tooth and nail!